From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ulrich Mueller Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Lightweight, C-only implementation of Emacs Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2020 21:37:33 +0200 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="3872"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Jeffrey Walton Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 03 21:40:47 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k2gKF-0000un-EU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2020 21:40:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58668 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k2gKE-0000sR-Et for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2020 15:40:46 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40640) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k2gHO-0005o2-BM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2020 15:37:50 -0400 Original-Received: from woodpecker.gentoo.org ([2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]:59659 helo=smtp.gentoo.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k2gHL-00047Q-RI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2020 15:37:49 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Jeffrey Walton's message of "Mon, 3 Aug 2020 14:38:43 -0400") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4; envelope-from=ulm@gentoo.org; helo=smtp.gentoo.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/08/03 15:37:38 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = ??? X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:253415 Archived-At: >>>>> On Mon, 03 Aug 2020, Jeffrey Walton wrote: >> > Does anyone have a list of Emacs replacements? >> >> There is a list of Emacs implementations in the Gentoo wiki: >> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Emacs/Emacs-like_editors > You should probably take Zile off the list or make a note it is not > recommended for use. According to Reuben Thomas, one of the Zile > maintainers (from Zile Issue 58880): > I consider Zile to be in maintenance mode. I do not > recommend it use, I will not be adding features ... Well, it is feature complete then. The same is true for most of the lightweight implementations in the list. Why would that be a problem?