From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#865: 23.0.60; The directory is unsafe today Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2008 12:54:51 +0300 Message-ID: References: <48BD642C.5050405@gmail.com> <48BD74D5.4050800@gnu.org> <48BDD155.8060005@gnu.org> <48BF2171.8040101@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii , 865@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1220609754 21050 80.91.229.12 (5 Sep 2008 10:15:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 10:15:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: Francis Litterio , 865@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 05 12:16:48 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KbYMs-0001VB-52 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2008 12:16:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46702 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KbYLr-0000yS-L7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2008 06:15:39 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KbYE7-0007jU-A6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2008 06:07:40 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KbYE3-0007iQ-4T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2008 06:07:37 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41117 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KbYE2-0007i5-Cf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2008 06:07:34 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:34530) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KbYE2-00031O-Az for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2008 06:07:34 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m85A7V2r004503; Fri, 5 Sep 2008 03:07:32 -0700 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id m85A06D2000859; Fri, 5 Sep 2008 03:00:06 -0700 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2008 10:00:06 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: report 865 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 865-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B865.122060850531544 (code B ref 865); Fri, 05 Sep 2008 10:00:06 +0000 Original-Received: (at 865) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 5 Sep 2008 09:55:05 +0000 Original-Received: from mtaout3.012.net.il (mtaout3.012.net.il [84.95.2.7]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m859t0hu031415 for <865@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Fri, 5 Sep 2008 02:55:01 -0700 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.211.50]) by i_mtaout3.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) with ESMTPA id <0K6P00AENVKL84C0@i_mtaout3.012.net.il> for 865@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; Fri, 05 Sep 2008 12:55:37 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2008 06:07:36 -0400 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:20187 Archived-At: > From: Francis Litterio > Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2008 14:08:36 -0400 > Cc: > > But if Windows says the file is owned by the Local Administrators group, > hasn't the information about which user created it been lost? The file > is not truly owned by any single user. > > Thus, (nth 2 (file-attributes ...)) can never return a meaningful > existing user ID for a file that is owned by a group. Well, that's the problem we are trying to solve...