From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: File menu changes (suggestions)
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 09:24:33 +0200
Message-ID: <uekaofej2.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <MEEKKIABFKKDFJMPIOEBAELMCLAA.drew.adams@oracle.com>
	<E1DmP2N-0006s1-5G@fencepost.gnu.org> <upsu9eyq2.fsf@gnu.org>
	<E1DmmJw-0004Ln-0E@fencepost.gnu.org>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1119855009 32447 80.91.229.2 (27 Jun 2005 06:50:09 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 06:50:09 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: drew.adams@oracle.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 27 08:50:07 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DmnR4-00062B-Pl
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 08:49:39 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DmnYf-0002f1-1h
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 02:57:29 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Dmn6d-0003XR-AT
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 02:28:31 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Dmn6a-0003VB-7g
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 02:28:28 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dmn6Z-0003PL-8X
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 02:28:27 -0400
Original-Received: from [192.114.186.24] (helo=legolas.inter.net.il)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
	id 1Dmn70-0005aO-6b; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 02:28:54 -0400
Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-83-130-242-224.inter.net.il
	[83.130.242.224]) by legolas.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.8-GR)
	with ESMTP id ESN41921 (AUTH halo1);
	Mon, 27 Jun 2005 09:24:34 +0300 (IDT)
Original-To: rms@gnu.org
In-reply-to: <E1DmmJw-0004Ln-0E@fencepost.gnu.org> (rms@gnu.org)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:39620
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:39620

> From: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
> CC: drew.adams@oracle.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 01:38:12 -0400
> 
>     FWIW, I see nothing wrong with "Unsplit".  At least one other GUI
>     program uses "Remove split", which is very similar; if that is better,
>     let's use it.
> 
> It isn't better a priori, but if it is widely used and lots of people
> would have seen it, that would make it better.  What other programs
> use "Remove split"?

I saw it in Word.