From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mathias Dahl Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Is there a mod-emacs? Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 17:55:49 +0100 Message-ID: References: <4870e7ae-ab72-4d0b-8d42-9a4ed0a54e8d@e23g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <871w8vwb2e.fsf@lion.rapttech.com.au> <86prwfz310.fsf@timbral.net> <87sl1auqke.fsf@lion.rapttech.com.au> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1199727706 23183 80.91.229.12 (7 Jan 2008 17:41:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 17:41:46 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 07 18:42:08 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JBvzB-0001rY-6c for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2008 18:42:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JBvyo-0000rx-6h for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2008 12:41:42 -0500 Original-Path: shelby.stanford.edu!headwall.stanford.edu!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help Original-Lines: 9 Original-X-Trace: individual.net HtKNLoxNaseQkYb2/GKDQQVn3p6QU4Z/3cmlXyvEMCWgAwiDO7 Cancel-Lock: sha1:gcSROfD/jJaiYZlyDIblXTEE4Cc= sha1:ikTHwNU+Uwpu3fE5v8xgPRn7DEw= User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (windows-nt) Original-Xref: shelby.stanford.edu gnu.emacs.help:155133 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:50554 Archived-At: Tim X writes: > Another approach that might be interesting is to create an emacs > lisp package for common lisp. You could then take advantage of > mod_lisp. Not sure how you would handle the lisp1 vs lisp2 > differences Both are Lisp2, aren't they? Maybe you thought about lexical vs dynamical scoping?