From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] etags/ctags v22.0.92 break Linux kernel `make TAGS/tags` Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2007 23:24:34 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1166990491.2706.205.camel@localhost.localdomain> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1167773182 17949 80.91.229.12 (2 Jan 2007 21:26:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 21:26:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 02 22:26:18 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1H1r9C-0001uI-N8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Jan 2007 22:26:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H1r9B-0004pM-UK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Jan 2007 16:26:14 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H1r7z-0004Jm-7A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jan 2007 16:24:59 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H1r7x-0004IT-3E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jan 2007 16:24:58 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H1r7w-0004IA-Sv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jan 2007 16:24:56 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.66] (helo=romy.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1H1r7u-0007Fm-SP; Tue, 02 Jan 2007 16:24:55 -0500 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-83-130-254-190.inter.net.il [83.130.254.190]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id GRZ50679 (AUTH halo1); Tue, 2 Jan 2007 23:24:30 +0200 (IST) Original-To: Francesco Potorti` In-reply-to: (message from Francesco Potorti` on Tue, 02 Jan 2007 12:41:40 +0100) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:64650 Archived-At: > Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2007 12:41:40 +0100 > From: Francesco Potorti` > Cc: Don Mullis , Olaf Dabrunz , > Darren Hiebert , > Bram Moolenaar , emacs-devel@gnu.org > > After checking the behaviour of Exuberant ctags, I decided to follow the > same route and allow for duplicated tags in ctags mode. I added an > undocumented option --no-duplicates, just for emergency, that may be > deleted in a future release of Etags. I also undocumented the existing > --no-warn option. > > If anyone wants to comment on this change, please let me know. Should this change in behavior be mentioned in etc/NEWS?