From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 22:36:46 +0200 Message-ID: References: <85tzxazb8r.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1172695066 27564 80.91.229.12 (28 Feb 2007 20:37:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 20:37:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 28 21:37:38 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HMVYH-0004vW-33 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 21:37:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HMVYH-0001PE-VE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 15:37:29 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HMVY6-0001NC-7g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 15:37:18 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HMVY5-0001M1-Bc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 15:37:17 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HMVY5-0001Lj-76 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 15:37:17 -0500 Original-Received: from heller.inter.net.il ([213.8.233.23]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HMVY4-00032T-4B; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 15:37:16 -0500 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-14-208.inter.net.il [80.230.14.208]) by heller.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA) with ESMTP id BZS20342 (AUTH halo1); Wed, 28 Feb 2007 22:36:34 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: (message from Richard Stallman on Wed, 28 Feb 2007 02:27:41 -0500) X-detected-kernel: FreeBSD 4.7-5.2 (or MacOS X 10.2-10.4) (2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:67063 Archived-At: > From: Richard Stallman > CC: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 02:27:41 -0500 > > I was talking from memory. I will make some measurements in a few > days and tell the results. > > I am not sure measurements are relevant here. AFAICT, you asked for them explicitly: Would you please tell us more? What sort of machine are you using, and how bad are these delays? We need to compare them with the delays caused by stealth fontification. > The question is whether the delays avoided by stealth fontification > bother you. If you don't notice them, they don't bother you. > > Do they bother you? My recollection is that they do annoy, but I will need to time things to give more accurate information instead of hand-waving. However, if you don't feel you need to see more or less precise numbers, feel free to tell me: I have better things to do with my limited free time than gather measurements no one needs.