From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: isearch multiple buffers
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 22:01:50 +0200
Message-ID: <ud4v1sl01.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87odfcggvl.fsf@jurta.org> <E1Ig21z-0000tm-9r@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<871wc15m2b.fsf@jurta.org> <E1IgMvR-0001IP-R9@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<87lk9ylkbb.fsf@jurta.org> <E1IjVCx-0000S5-Ia@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<87hckk9uoa.fsf@jurta.org> <87abqcrq9p.fsf@catnip.gol.com>
	<471BE5D3.3050007@gmail.com> <jwv7ilg0y8k.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<87y7dwq7x9.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <E1IkDwL-0008MQ-Hk@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<umyu9siq7.fsf@gnu.org> <87odepv21n.fsf@catnip.gol.com>
	<uabq9rvtn.fsf@gnu.org> <buod4v55d4a.fsf@dhapc248.dev.necel.com>
	<uwstctk4p.fsf@gnu.org> <87ir4wjcev.fsf@catnip.gol.com>
	<uejfju8w0.fsf@gnu.org>
	<200710261516.l9QFGQ7C001069@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu>
	<ufxzxsmvk.fsf@gnu.org>
	<200710261941.l9QJfcH0010503@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1193429060 32334 80.91.229.12 (26 Oct 2007 20:04:20 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 20:04:20 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Dan Nicolaescu <dann@ics.uci.edu>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 26 22:04:22 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1IlVPp-0002HT-Ed
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 22:04:21 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IlVPg-0008Dm-V3
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 16:04:12 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IlVOH-0006Bn-Gx
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 16:02:45 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IlVOF-00069P-VN
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 16:02:45 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IlVOF-00069G-7o
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 16:02:43 -0400
Original-Received: from romy.inter.net.il ([213.8.233.24])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1IlVOE-0005mG-Js
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 16:02:42 -0400
Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-4-136.inter.net.il [80.230.4.136])
	by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA)
	with ESMTP id JFN96095 (AUTH halo1);
	Fri, 26 Oct 2007 22:01:36 +0200 (IST)
In-reply-to: <200710261941.l9QJfcH0010503@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> (message
	from Dan Nicolaescu on Fri, 26 Oct 2007 12:41:38 -0700)
X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: FreeBSD 4.7-5.2 (or MacOS X
	10.2-10.4) (2)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:81792
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/81792>

> From: Dan Nicolaescu <dann@ics.uci.edu>
> Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 12:41:38 -0700
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> 
>   > So there are, like, 4-5 instances since 2004---more than I thought,
>   > but still very much negligible.
> 
> I wouldn't call it negligible, it is annoying.

I guess we have very different levels of annoyance, then.