From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: What is normal these days (display.texi)? Date: Sat, 08 Jul 2006 15:57:34 +0300 Message-ID: References: <85zmflu62p.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <85lkr5qusn.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <85psgg4hvv.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1152363486 31364 80.91.229.2 (8 Jul 2006 12:58:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 12:58:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: storm@cua.dk, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 08 14:58:03 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FzCNm-0001bu-UX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Jul 2006 14:58:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FzCNm-0001Wt-H5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Jul 2006 08:58:02 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FzCNa-0001Wo-06 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Jul 2006 08:57:50 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FzCNY-0001WW-Gj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Jul 2006 08:57:49 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FzCNY-0001WT-BZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Jul 2006 08:57:48 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.20] (helo=nitzan.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FzCO9-0002yj-0c; Sat, 08 Jul 2006 08:58:25 -0400 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-70-118.inter.net.il [80.230.70.118]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id EBC72542 (AUTH halo1); Sat, 8 Jul 2006 15:57:32 +0300 (IDT) Original-To: David Kastrup In-reply-to: <85psgg4hvv.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (message from David Kastrup on Sat, 08 Jul 2006 10:31:48 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:56782 Archived-At: > From: David Kastrup > Date: Sat, 08 Jul 2006 10:31:48 +0200 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, storm@cua.dk > > Richard Stallman writes: > > > Note that continuation is different from filling; continuation happens > > on the screen only, not in the buffer contents, and it breaks a line > > ! precisely at the right margin, not at a word boundary. @xref{Filling}, > > ! @ref{Longlines,, Long Lines Mode, emacs, The GNU Emacs Manual}. > > > > That doesn't seem like proper Texinfo usage; is it? > > What's wrong with it? As far as I can see, it is following the specs > to the letter, and it works. Perhaps this small modification is better: Note that continuation is different from filling; continuation happens on the screen only, not in the buffer contents, and it breaks a line ! precisely at the right margin, not at a word boundary. @xref{Filling}, ! and @ref{Longlines,, Long Lines Mode, emacs, The GNU Emacs Manual}. ^^^