From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.comp.gcc.fortran Subject: Re: Emacs and GFortran Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2006 14:45:53 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20061030211304.GB7761@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20061031151022.GA13987@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <454A6F30.2000904@wanadoo.fr> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1162557999 27325 80.91.229.2 (3 Nov 2006 12:46:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 12:46:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Angelo.Graziosi@roma1.infn.it, fortran@gcc.gnu.org, sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 03 13:46:36 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GfyR2-0000wY-C9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Nov 2006 13:46:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GfyR1-0003Si-NX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Nov 2006 07:46:11 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GfyQk-0003K7-Hx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Nov 2006 07:45:54 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GfyQh-00039A-GJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Nov 2006 07:45:54 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GfyQh-00038p-6l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Nov 2006 07:45:51 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.20] (helo=nitzan.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GfyQh-0001Rf-4b for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Nov 2006 07:45:51 -0500 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-43-22.inter.net.il [80.230.43.22]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA) with ESMTP id FBU75869 (AUTH halo1); Fri, 3 Nov 2006 14:45:47 +0200 (IST) Original-To: Paul Thomas In-reply-to: <454A6F30.2000904@wanadoo.fr> (message from Paul Thomas on Thu, 02 Nov 2006 23:20:32 +0100) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:61688 gmane.comp.gcc.fortran:15417 Archived-At: > Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 23:20:32 +0100 > From: Paul Thomas > Cc: Steve Kargl , > Angelo.Graziosi@roma1.infn.it, fortran@gcc.gnu.org, > emacs-devel@gnu.org > > Hostility, such as it is, has been triggered by the hectoring attitude > of those who have crept out of the woodwork to add their halfpenny worth > to this thread; none of whom have contributed to gfortran, as far as I > know. If this paragraph does not have hostility written all over it, then perhaps I don't know what hostility is. FYI, those who ``crept out of the woodwork'' did so only _after_ the complaints about the non-standard error messages were met with clearly hostile attitude and ``NO'' responses. Perhaps you missed that while reading the long thread, with some messages out of order due to mail delivery delays. > I rather think that the steering committee would support the > gfortran maintainers, were it to come to that. If it is really important to you to know, we could start a discussion with them.