From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Pretest
Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 22:08:57 +0200
Message-ID: <ubqn3gpwm.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87slggjtbb.fsf@furball.mit.edu>
	<E1Glm6G-00009g-VO@fencepost.gnu.org>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1163967102 30870 80.91.229.2 (19 Nov 2006 20:11:42 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 20:11:42 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: cyd@stupidchicken.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 19 21:11:40 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Glt0t-00054Z-LR
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 21:11:39 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Glt0t-0008LD-1R
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 15:11:39 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GlsyV-0006Rk-E8
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 15:09:11 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GlsyK-0006Hc-Rd
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 15:09:04 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GlsyI-0006FK-KW
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 15:08:59 -0500
Original-Received: from [192.114.186.20] (helo=nitzan.inter.net.il)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52)
	id 1GlsyG-0001SZ-D3; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 15:08:56 -0500
Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([81.5.49.64])
	by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA)
	with ESMTP id FFQ36820 (AUTH halo1);
	Sun, 19 Nov 2006 22:08:54 +0200 (IST)
Original-To: rms@gnu.org
In-reply-to: <E1Glm6G-00009g-VO@fencepost.gnu.org> (message from Richard
	Stallman on Sun, 19 Nov 2006 07:48:44 -0500)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:62492
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/62492>

> From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
> Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 07:48:44 -0500
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> 
> I think someone suggested using Reply-to to avoid encouraging people
> to send all their replies to the emacs-pretesters list.  That would
> do the job if someone were doing "reply to sender", but if someone
> does "reply all" it will still go to the list.
> 
> Would Mail-followup-to do the job?

I guess it depends on the MUA.  We could use both these headers, just
to be sure.