From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Syncing Gnus and Emacs repositories Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 22:11:22 +0300 Message-ID: References: <6sps3z32ap.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87tztbcue9.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87lkemmrg4.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <18033.64249.816850.550250@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <85ejkcq32v.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <85k5u4nlrh.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <85ir9lkfhk.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1182193906 8151 80.91.229.12 (18 Jun 2007 19:11:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 19:11:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, handa@m17n.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 18 21:11:43 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1I0MdZ-000097-9J for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 21:11:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I0MdY-0002Xt-PB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 15:11:40 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1I0MdP-0002PB-LA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 15:11:31 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1I0MdN-0002Lt-TD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 15:11:31 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I0MdN-0002Lc-Mm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 15:11:29 -0400 Original-Received: from heller.inter.net.il ([213.8.233.23]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1I0MdM-0004pr-HS; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 15:11:28 -0400 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-206-181.inter.net.il [80.230.206.181]) by heller.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA) with ESMTP id CWB37937 (AUTH halo1); Mon, 18 Jun 2007 22:11:22 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <85ir9lkfhk.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (message from David Kastrup on Mon, 18 Jun 2007 07:18:15 +0200) X-detected-kernel: FreeBSD 4.7-5.2 (or MacOS X 10.2-10.4) (2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:73243 Archived-At: > Cc: Kenichi Handa , emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: David Kastrup > Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 07:18:15 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> From: Kenichi Handa > >> CC: dak@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > >> Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 08:07:28 +0900 > >> > >> No. I asked to merge unicode-2 into the trunk, but as it > >> was not accepted, I asked not to make heavy changes to the > >> trunk unless one takes care of emacs-unicode-2 branch too. > > > > So in that case, making such changes in the Unicode branch directly, > > as I suggested, would be a good way of installing changes without > > interfering with the future merge, right? > > Could you explain how putting _unrelated_ changes into the Unicode > branch would not interfere with a merge? In the above, by ``without interfering'' I meant that it will not make Kenichi's work harder when the Unicode branch is merged. I don't see any way of zero interference, as long as there's a branch (actually, two of them) waiting to be merged RSN. But I think installing ``heavy changes'' in the Unicode branch will tend to minimize the interference.