Re: Removing MULTI_KBOARD

[Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>]

> From: Dan Nicolaescu <dann@ics.uci.edu>
> Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 12:13:24 -0700
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> 
>   > > From: Dan Nicolaescu <dann@ics.uci.edu>
>   > > Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org
>   > > Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 11:24:38 -0700
>   > > 
>   > > Was the removed MULTI_KBOARD code actually needed?
>   > 
>   > I don't know.  I debugged the current code, and never looked back,
>   > because I knew it was pointless, and because in my experience
>   > comparing with older versions is not an efficient way of debugging a
>   > program.  It's all in the logs and in CVS, if you really want to know.
> 
> So you are in effect saying that you preemptive attack was baseless and
> without any technical justification (the HR approach was so wrong that's
> not even worth disscussing).  Refusing to provide a technical
> justification after so many requests is quite telling.  Thank you.

Look, Dan, it's quite clear that you want to pick up this fight right
where you left off.  But I'm done fighting.  The code and the logs are
there for everyone to see and study, and they speak for themselves.
They are the technical justification you are asking for, as far as I'm
concerned.  Whatever conclusions you draw from that is your own
business and responsibility.