From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: bug#865: 23.0.60; The directory is unsafe today Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2008 00:38:09 +0300 Message-ID: References: <48BD642C.5050405@gmail.com> <48BD74D5.4050800@gnu.org> <48BDD155.8060005@gnu.org> <48BF2171.8040101@gnu.org> <48BF5671.1040705@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii , 865@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1220737681 10070 80.91.229.12 (6 Sep 2008 21:48:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2008 21:48:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org, 865@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 06 23:48:56 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Kc5eI-00047I-QD for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 06 Sep 2008 23:48:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57874 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Kc5dI-0001fm-Vc for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 06 Sep 2008 17:47:53 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Kc5d4-0001YN-Co for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Sep 2008 17:47:38 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Kc5d1-0001Ww-Q4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Sep 2008 17:47:37 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=44141 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Kc5d1-0001Wg-FD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Sep 2008 17:47:35 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:33150) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Kc5d1-0004eb-0D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Sep 2008 17:47:35 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m86LlVEK001002; Sat, 6 Sep 2008 14:47:32 -0700 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id m86Lj3g7032072; Sat, 6 Sep 2008 14:45:03 -0700 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2008 21:45:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: report 865 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B.122073710430161 (code B ref -1); Sat, 06 Sep 2008 21:45:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 6 Sep 2008 21:38:24 +0000 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m86LcK0j030153 for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2008 14:38:21 -0700 Original-Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]:47003 helo=mx10.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Kc5SP-0004h3-9N for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Sep 2008 17:36:37 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Kc5U0-0003IG-In for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Sep 2008 17:38:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout6.012.net.il ([84.95.2.16]:17165) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Kc5U0-0003I8-6n; Sat, 06 Sep 2008 17:38:16 -0400 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.211.50]) by i-mtaout6.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0K6S006LOMSQO950@i-mtaout6.012.net.il>; Sun, 07 Sep 2008 00:38:51 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (1203?) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2008 17:47:36 -0400 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:20255 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:22999 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: 865@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, jasonr@gnu.org, emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2008 15:45:29 -0400 > > > So you are saying we should assume that when umask has its two lower > > mode bits set to zero, the intent is to create a private file > > accessible only by the user who runs Emacs? I don't like such > > assumptions, but if I'm the only one, so be it. > > It's not an assumption: it's what default-file-modes says. On Posix platforms, yes. The MS-Windows access right set is richer than just Read, Write, Execute.