From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#1004: 23.0.60; Error visiting C files Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 11:48:47 +0300 Message-ID: References: <48D3E9F6.7020802@gmx.at> <48D636F7.8030901@gmx.at> <48DCE003.4060308@gmx.at> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii , 1004@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1222506637 31022 80.91.229.12 (27 Sep 2008 09:10:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 09:10:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 1004@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 27 11:11:35 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KjVpl-0001x9-Vp for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 27 Sep 2008 11:11:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49107 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KjVoj-0007WS-9K for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 27 Sep 2008 05:10:21 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KjVoe-0007V9-Jx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Sep 2008 05:10:16 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KjVoc-0007Tw-Eg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Sep 2008 05:10:15 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=52758 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KjVob-0007TX-T1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Sep 2008 05:10:14 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:59564) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KjVob-0002qx-4x for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Sep 2008 05:10:13 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m8R99sZM024728; Sat, 27 Sep 2008 02:09:54 -0700 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id m8R8t4AN020650; Sat, 27 Sep 2008 01:55:04 -0700 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs , don@donarmstrong.com Resent-Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 08:55:04 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: report 1004 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs,cc-mode X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 1004-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B1004.122250535319295 (code B ref 1004); Sat, 27 Sep 2008 08:55:04 +0000 Original-Received: (at 1004) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 27 Sep 2008 08:49:13 +0000 Original-Received: from mtaout6.012.net.il (mtaout6.012.net.il [84.95.2.16]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m8R8n9lW019289 for <1004@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Sat, 27 Sep 2008 01:49:10 -0700 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.170.116]) by i-mtaout6.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0K7U00F80J73E7F0@i-mtaout6.012.net.il> for 1004@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; Sat, 27 Sep 2008 11:49:51 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <48DCE003.4060308@gmx.at> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 05:10:15 -0400 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:20826 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 15:13:39 +0200 > From: martin rudalics > CC: 1004@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com > > >>> IMO, we should add explicit dependencies for cc*.elc files. The patch > >>> below works for me; does anyone see a problem with it? > >> Please install. I suppose we'll notice soon enough if something > >> goes wrong ;-) > > > > Done. > > So far no problems here. Thanks for testing.