From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.lisp.gcl.devel,gmane.comp.mathematics.axiom.devel Subject: Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: unexec and fedora core 4 Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 11:20:31 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87hd9j42g3.fsf@jurta.org> <54acfbnjoh.fsf_-_@intech19.enhanced.com> <54wtiee1up.fsf@intech19.enhanced.com> <54ek4mymi7.fsf@intech19.enhanced.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1134206583 10169 80.91.229.2 (10 Dec 2005 09:23:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 09:23:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: gcl-devel@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, daly@axiom-developer.org, kaufmann@cs.utexas.edu, axiom-developer@nongnu.org, jsnell@iki.fi, sandip@cs.utexas.edu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 10 10:23:01 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1El0ui-00053V-A3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 10:21:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1El0v5-0000g8-Up for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 04:21:31 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1El0ur-0000fO-Q4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 04:21:17 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1El0uq-0000f4-OW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 04:21:17 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1El0un-0000e6-0N; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 04:21:13 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.66] (helo=romy.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1El0w8-0001Ir-94; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 04:22:36 -0500 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-42-206.inter.net.il [80.230.42.206]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.2-GA) with ESMTP id DDL26829 (AUTH halo1); Sat, 10 Dec 2005 11:20:27 +0200 (IST) Original-To: Camm Maguire In-reply-to: <54ek4mymi7.fsf@intech19.enhanced.com> (message from Camm Maguire on 09 Dec 2005 16:43:44 -0500) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:47376 gmane.lisp.gcl.devel:6057 gmane.comp.mathematics.axiom.devel:7634 Archived-At: > From: Camm Maguire > Date: 09 Dec 2005 16:43:44 -0500 > Cc: gcl-devel@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, root , > Matt Kaufmann , > axiom-developer@nongnu.org, Sandip Ray > > OK, here is what I believe now to be the case -- the SELinux option > allow_execmem, which is 'active' on the bad box, is causing the > problem. All is well if one takes the drastic action of > > sudo /bin/sh -c "/usr/sbin/setenforce 0" > > but will probably allso work if one changes > > /etc/selinux/strict/src/policy/domains/user.te:bool allow_execmem false; > > to > > /etc/selinux/strict/src/policy/domains/user.te:bool allow_execmem true; > > and > > sudo /bin/sh -c "cd /etc/selinux/strict/src/policy && make load" > > though I have not confirmed this not wanting to hose the machine in > question. Should we add something along these lines to etc/PROBLEMS?