From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: NT icons Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 13:02:00 +0200 Message-ID: References: <8764a7oxbu.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <45D6D53B.9010101@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1171710205 695 80.91.229.12 (17 Feb 2007 11:03:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 11:03:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rgm@gnu.org, cyd@stupidchicken.com, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Jason Rumney Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 17 12:03:16 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HINLT-0003HQ-Q3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 17 Feb 2007 12:03:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HINLT-0002ze-Fk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 17 Feb 2007 06:03:11 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HINLG-0002yt-FL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Feb 2007 06:02:58 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HINLF-0002yE-95 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Feb 2007 06:02:58 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HINLF-0002yB-6Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Feb 2007 06:02:57 -0500 Original-Received: from nitzan.inter.net.il ([213.8.233.22]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HINKz-0003ct-EF; Sat, 17 Feb 2007 06:02:42 -0500 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([81.5.50.212]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA) with ESMTP id GBH78733 (AUTH halo1); Sat, 17 Feb 2007 13:01:53 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <45D6D53B.9010101@gnu.org> (message from Jason Rumney on Sat, 17 Feb 2007 10:13:15 +0000) X-detected-kernel: FreeBSD 4.7-5.2 (or MacOS X 10.2-10.4) (2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:66484 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 10:13:15 +0000 > From: Jason Rumney > Cc: Glenn Morris , cyd@stupidchicken.com, rms@gnu.org, > emacs-devel@gnu.org > > Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > If this means you will delete emacs21.ico as well, I think that's not > > the right thing. > > > Why are the Windows icons to be treated differently? I didn't say they should. I didn't track this discussion close enough to realize emacs21.ico has something to do with non-Windows icons. If those non-Windows icons were deleted as well, I think we should restore them as well. > I don't see the sense in keeping unused cruft around. They are unused by default, but quite usable, if someone wants to have the old icons.