From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: utf-16le vs utf-16-le Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 06:26:21 +0300 Message-ID: References: <87wsn1fl72.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87prssgacl.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <851w58q24a.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <87lk3gfg40.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87fxtof8x1.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87wsmzdpsp.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87abjtr1xt.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <85hce1a6d0.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <87myntp3k6.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1208402856 6898 80.91.229.12 (17 Apr 2008 03:27:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 03:27:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 17 05:28:13 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JmKnF-00020I-96 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 05:28:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JmKma-0005nl-I4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 23:27:32 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JmKmW-0005kM-20 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 23:27:28 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JmKmT-0005dy-KT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 23:27:27 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JmKmT-0005dg-F7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 23:27:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout4.012.net.il ([84.95.2.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JmKmO-0001A4-Jn; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 23:27:20 -0400 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([83.130.246.94]) by i_mtaout4.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) with ESMTPA id <0JZG00MSRA7CWN11@i_mtaout4.012.net.il>; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 06:40:25 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <87myntp3k6.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 9.1 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:95387 Archived-At: > From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , > emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 12:23:37 +0900 > > I also find it faintly unclean when the system has to go around > parsing symbol names to do things like change the EOL convention > preferred for a buffer. We don't parse the symbol name at all, AFAIR; instead, the properties of each symbol are defined in advance by define-coding-system.