From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: faq.texi Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 00:07:30 +0200 Message-ID: References: <878xstfkz2.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> <87d5i23qek.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> <87psm0n9x9.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> <87lkwnkmcb.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> <8764npegbm.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> <87bqxgdevj.fsf@jurta.org> <87oe1gfbkd.fsf@jurta.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1139526604 15107 80.91.229.2 (9 Feb 2006 23:10:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 23:10:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: romain@orebokech.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 10 00:10:01 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F7KvD-0000lz-8A for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 00:09:58 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F7KvC-0007fv-Hz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2006 18:09:54 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1F7Jww-0007WB-5C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2006 17:07:38 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1F7Jwu-0007VO-Ie for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2006 17:07:37 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F7Jwt-0007VI-AI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2006 17:07:36 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.17] (helo=gandalf.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1F7K0W-0002m0-Cu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2006 17:11:20 -0500 Original-Received: from nitzan.inter.net.il (nitzan.inter.net.il [192.114.186.20]) by gandalf.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.1-GA) with ESMTP id HVE35349; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 00:07:28 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-228-240-137.inter.net.il [84.228.240.137]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id CRC38066 (AUTH halo1); Fri, 10 Feb 2006 00:07:27 +0200 (IST) Original-To: Juri Linkov In-reply-to: <87oe1gfbkd.fsf@jurta.org> (message from Juri Linkov on Thu, 09 Feb 2006 23:48:34 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:50279 Archived-At: > From: Juri Linkov > Cc: romain@orebokech.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 23:48:34 +0200 > > > Well, if you oppose to the C-y binding in isearch, then I think you > > should disqualify yourself from arguing about an identical binding for > > S-insert, since it's clear that you will dislike them both on the same > > grounds. I suggested the S-insert binding for consistency. > > There is no inconsistency in my wishes. I wish: > > - one key to bind to isearch-yank-line (not C-y) > - one key to exit isearch and yank (S-insert) Yeah, like I said: you ``consistently'' dislike both C-y and S-Ins in this context. By contrast, what I said is if C-y does something, S-Ins should do the same.