From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.xemacs.beta Subject: Re: Emacs setup assistants Date: 20 May 2004 11:43:55 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <87zn847n6a.fsf@mail.jurta.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1085042657 24924 80.91.224.253 (20 May 2004 08:44:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 08:44:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: juri@jurta.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, xemacs-beta@xemacs.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Thu May 20 10:44:11 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BQj9v-0008EQ-00 for ; Thu, 20 May 2004 10:44:11 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BQj9v-0008LT-00 for ; Thu, 20 May 2004 10:44:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BQj9P-00034K-3u for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Thu, 20 May 2004 04:43:39 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.34) id 1BQj8K-0002r1-5T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 May 2004 04:42:32 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.34) id 1BQj7k-00026P-6R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 May 2004 04:42:28 -0400 Original-Received: from [207.232.27.5] (helo=WST0035) by monty-python.gnu.org with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BQj7j-00022u-Jj; Thu, 20 May 2004 04:41:56 -0400 Original-To: David Kastrup In-reply-to: (message from David Kastrup on 20 May 2004 09:25:23 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:23768 gmane.emacs.xemacs.beta:14765 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:23768 > From: David Kastrup > Date: 20 May 2004 09:25:23 +0200 > > > So there is a more general question: why not extend Customize > > for a guided tour through options? > > Because it does not lend itself to writing? For Texinfo, we have > modes that facilitate getting a nice, human-manageable document > source. We don't have that for some weird stuff of Lisp functions. Do we really need an elaborate authoring support in this case? A tool such as the one being discussed needs mostly small chinks of plain text interspersed with hyperlinks, something for which Customize (and indeed even Help functions) already have the necessary infrastructure, or at least large parts of it. I'm probably missing something (since both Lars and Per would have already thought about that), but what?