From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: describe-bindings: ^L, bad order, naming Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 21:48:14 +0200 Message-ID: References: <200511112049.jABKn9r23432@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <200511121428.jACES8A26790@raven.dms.auburn.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1131824985 29511 80.91.229.2 (12 Nov 2005 19:49:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 19:49:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: drew.adams@oracle.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 12 20:49:37 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Eb1MR-0005sh-GN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 12 Nov 2005 20:48:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Eb1MR-0007Dd-0T for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 12 Nov 2005 14:48:27 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Eb1ME-0007DO-V6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Nov 2005 14:48:15 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Eb1MD-0007DC-8g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Nov 2005 14:48:14 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Eb1MD-0007D9-5N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Nov 2005 14:48:13 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.20] (helo=nitzan.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Eb1MD-0006a6-8i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Nov 2005 14:48:13 -0500 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-228-139-67.inter.net.il [84.228.139.67]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.6.5-GR) with ESMTP id BXY31554 (AUTH halo1); Sat, 12 Nov 2005 21:48:09 +0200 (IST) Original-To: Luc Teirlinck In-reply-to: <200511121428.jACES8A26790@raven.dms.auburn.edu> (message from Luc Teirlinck on Sat, 12 Nov 2005 08:28:08 -0600 (CST)) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:45832 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 08:28:08 -0600 (CST) > From: Luc Teirlinck > CC: drew.adams@oracle.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > ??? Strange logic. If I print the buffer (I admit I never did that; > is there someone here that did?), why should I care exactly how many > printed pages will I get? > > Not to waste too much paper and not too wind up with too many nearly > blank pages. Never seen anyone who'd worry that much about this. > Do you really believe newbies will know about C-x C-q and > removing the page break? > > Of course. C-x C-q is on the reference card Ha! I invite you to take a poll among newbies how many of them have read the reference card.