From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 49, Issue 33 Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2006 17:56:55 +0200 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: dough.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1165593429 14330 80.91.229.10 (8 Dec 2006 15:57:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 15:57:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 08 16:57:07 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by dough.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Gsi5y-0001s1-OS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Dec 2006 16:57:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gsi5y-0006wv-Bj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Dec 2006 10:57:06 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Gsi5m-0006wG-G6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Dec 2006 10:56:54 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Gsi5k-0006v7-Mm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Dec 2006 10:56:54 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gsi5k-0006v1-Jo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Dec 2006 10:56:52 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.20] (helo=nitzan.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Gsi5k-0000nE-42 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Dec 2006 10:56:52 -0500 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-228-4-98.inter.net.il [84.228.4.98]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA) with ESMTP id FKJ53122 (AUTH halo1); Fri, 8 Dec 2006 17:56:49 +0200 (IST) Original-To: "Juanma Barranquero" In-reply-to: (lekktu@gmail.com) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:63470 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 12:33:04 +0100 > From: "Juanma Barranquero" > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > The motivation for my change is that, in my in-place installation, > maintainer-clean (from lispref/Makefile.w32-in) was deleting elisp > and elisp-* from lispref/, not info/, so it nuked elisp-cover.texi. To avoid nuking more than we want, we could replace elisp-* with something like "elisp-? elisp-??". > maintainer-clean has clean as precondition, and clean already does: > - $(DEL) $(infodir)/elisp* > > so, what's the difference? It is an issue for non-inplace installations? It is an issue for building the ELisp manual as a separate package, the way it was before we bundled it with Emacs. Then the Info files were generated in place, so maintainer-clean deleted them. > I can revert my patch, but then maintainer-clean will have to be changed to > > maintainer-clean: clean > - $(DEL) $(infodir)/elisp $(infodir)/elisp-* elisp.dvi elisp.oaux No, there's no need to remove $(infodir)/elisp-* more than once. Instead, I suggest to replace elisp-* with "elisp-? elisp-??".