From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: merge emacs-pretest-bug and emacs-devel Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 22:45:08 +0300 Message-ID: References: <14wsw1bfmq.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <4xodhbhois.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1187034680 14974 80.91.229.12 (13 Aug 2007 19:51:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 19:51:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 13 21:51:16 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IKftP-0007UY-Fn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 21:48:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IKft4-0007dL-NF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 15:47:38 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IKfqk-0006p8-Rs for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 15:45:14 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IKfqj-0006oK-7Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 15:45:14 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IKfqi-0006oC-UW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 15:45:13 -0400 Original-Received: from romy.inter.net.il ([213.8.233.24]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IKfqh-0003RY-RH; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 15:45:12 -0400 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-83-130-238-248.inter.net.il [83.130.238.248]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id IPY50967 (AUTH halo1); Mon, 13 Aug 2007 22:45:05 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <4xodhbhois.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (message from Glenn Morris on Mon, 13 Aug 2007 03:39:07 -0400) X-Detected-Kernel: FreeBSD 4.7-5.2 (or MacOS X 10.2-10.4) (2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:76473 > From: Glenn Morris > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 03:39:07 -0400 > > Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > If we do that, what will happen to the archives of > > emacs-pretest-bug, both before and after the merge? > > I don't think anything should or would happen to the pre-merge > archives. Then we will need some kind of comment in the archives of emacs-devel that, before such-and-such date, messages could be in a different place. Otherwise, people will fail to find past bug reports a few years from now. > I don't really know the answer to the "after" part of your question; > but I expect that if the change is done by a mail alias (the easiest > way, AFAIK), then no more mails will appear in the e-p-b archives from > that point on. If it's possible to get the mailman software to do the > forwarding instead, then we could still archive things in e-p-b, > before forwarding them on to e-d. This might be nice (though people > would probably use e-p-b less than before). I don't know enough about mailman (does it even support mail aliases?), but this must be figured out before we merge, IMO.