From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs 23.0 is much slower starting than Emacs 22.3 Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 11:26:07 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20081022091136.GB924@muc.de> <20081022151444.GE924@muc.de> <48FF58FB.6000302@harpegolden.net> <20081022211202.GA1037@muc.de> <49001F5A.7040402@harpegolden.net> <20081023090908.GB2666@muc.de> <4900ACF9.7060501@harpegolden.net> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1224840462 29971 80.91.229.12 (24 Oct 2008 09:27:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 09:27:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: acm@muc.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, david@harpegolden.net To: Lennart Borgman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 24 11:28:39 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KtIxy-0001kZ-Qt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 11:28:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51723 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KtIwt-0006wx-2W for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 05:27:15 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KtIwS-0006on-Bm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 05:26:48 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KtIwQ-0006oD-Cb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 05:26:46 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=50067 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KtIwQ-0006o8-4f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 05:26:46 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout4.012.net.il ([84.95.2.10]:61586) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KtIwQ-0004wf-2y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 05:26:46 -0400 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.126.233.32]) by i_mtaout4.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) with ESMTPA id <0K9800IJHKY3T7K1@i_mtaout4.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 11:28:05 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 9.1 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:104934 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 00:33:01 +0200 > From: "Lennart Borgman" > Cc: "David De La Harpe Golden" , acm@muc.de, > monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > (defun test-insert-emacs-lisp-dir () > (benchmark 1 '(test-insert-dir "c:/emacs/u/070103/emacs/lisp/" nil)) > (message "======================= After cache warm up") > (message "Timing insert-file-contents-literally:") > (benchmark 1 '(test-insert-dir "c:/emacs/u/070103/emacs/lisp/" t)) > (benchmark 1 '(test-insert-dir "c:/emacs/u/070103/emacs/lisp/" t)) > (benchmark 1 '(test-insert-dir "c:/emacs/u/070103/emacs/lisp/" t)) > (message "Timing insert-file-contents:") > (benchmark 1 '(test-insert-dir "c:/emacs/u/070103/emacs/lisp/" nil)) > (benchmark 1 '(test-insert-dir "c:/emacs/u/070103/emacs/lisp/" nil)) > (benchmark 1 '(test-insert-dir "c:/emacs/u/070103/emacs/lisp/" nil)) > (message "Ready")) > > The output was > > ======================= After cache warm up > Timing insert-file-contents-literally: > Elapsed time: 5.531000s (0.094000s in 1 GCs) > Elapsed time: 5.594000s > Elapsed time: 5.828000s (0.093000s in 1 GCs) > Timing insert-file-contents: > Elapsed time: 9.484000s (0.188000s in 2 GCs) > Elapsed time: 8.922000s (0.188000s in 2 GCs) > Elapsed time: 8.953000s (0.203000s in 2 GCs) Thanks. However, without comparison with Emacs 22, it's hard to interpret those numbers.