From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: problem with system_eol_type
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 20:27:31 +0300
Message-ID: <u4pwxofb0.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <E1G7Qtf-0006YS-00@etlken>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1154366916 15381 80.91.229.2 (31 Jul 2006 17:28:36 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 17:28:36 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: mule-ja@m17n.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 31 19:28:29 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1G7bYV-0005yA-DX
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 19:27:51 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1G7bYU-0003wH-OI
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 13:27:50 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1G7bYK-0003vw-TS
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 13:27:40 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1G7bYJ-0003vc-Gb
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 13:27:40 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G7bYJ-0003vZ-Aw
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 13:27:39 -0400
Original-Received: from [192.114.186.73] (helo=heller.inter.net.il)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1G7bb1-0007Hx-0K
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 13:30:27 -0400
Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-228-246-135.inter.net.il
	[84.228.246.135]) by heller.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA)
	with ESMTP id ACX89533 (AUTH halo1);
	Mon, 31 Jul 2006 20:27:31 +0300 (IDT)
Original-To: Kenichi Handa <handa@m17n.org>
In-reply-to: <E1G7Qtf-0006YS-00@etlken> (message from Kenichi Handa on Mon, 31
	Jul 2006 15:04:59 +0900)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:57853
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/57853>

> From: Kenichi Handa <handa@m17n.org>
> Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 15:04:59 +0900
> Cc: mule-ja@m17n.org
> 
> But, the bug-reports say that there are many codes that
> assumes the previous behaviour, and some of them now don't
> work well on Windows.

What other packages, besides Gnus, were broken by this change?

> I think that it is cleaner to ask a program to specify the
> eol-type explicitly if it requires a specific eol-type on
> encoding.

I agree.