From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stephen Leake Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: abbreviate-file-name on Windows seems incorrect Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 07:55:11 -0500 Message-ID: References: <45A219D7.9030401@gnu.org> <45A2E241.1050101@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1168347372 26504 80.91.229.12 (9 Jan 2007 12:56:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 12:56:12 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 09 13:56:08 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1H4GWO-000307-5a for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 13:56:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H4GWN-0000xh-Se for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 07:56:07 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H4GWC-0000xc-C0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 07:55:56 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H4GWA-0000xQ-0B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 07:55:55 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H4GW9-0000xN-Pi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 07:55:53 -0500 Original-Received: from [207.172.157.102] (helo=smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1H4GW8-0008Ow-RT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 07:55:53 -0500 Original-Received: from mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.22]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 09 Jan 2007 07:55:50 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.7.5a-GA) with ESMTP id MTG61073; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 07:55:36 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from 208-59-165-113.c3-0.slvr-ubr1.lnh-slvr.md.cable.rcn.com (HELO ACS1100007992) ([208.59.165.113]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 09 Jan 2007 07:55:25 -0500 Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <45A2E241.1050101@gnu.org> (Jason Rumney's message of "Tue, 09 Jan 2007 00:30:57 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (windows-nt) X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net X-Junkmail-SD-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A090204.45A38F0C.0046,ss=1,fgs=0, ip=207.172.4.11, so=2006-05-09 23:27:51, dmn=5.2.125/2006-10-10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:65058 Archived-At: Jason Rumney writes: >> But I am not sure that this function is called often enough to make >> a significant difference. >> > Possibly not. But I'd prefer not to consider such changes now. That makes sense. But how about mentioning the caching of $HOME in the doc string? -- -- Stephe