From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: MAINTAINERS file Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2008 21:49:44 +0200 Message-ID: References: <18375.18663.981150.252393@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <87ir088d1y.fsf@red-bean.com> <18375.60094.959733.716249@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <87skzb5r3l.fsf@red-bean.com> <878x121lwk.fsf@red-bean.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1204401000 14878 80.91.229.12 (1 Mar 2008 19:50:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2008 19:50:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Karl Fogel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 01 20:50:26 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JVXiy-0000D2-OB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 01 Mar 2008 20:50:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JVXiS-0006v6-2x for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 01 Mar 2008 14:49:52 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JVXiO-0006ui-7h for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Mar 2008 14:49:48 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JVXiN-0006tf-Fb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Mar 2008 14:49:47 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JVXiN-0006tP-7d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Mar 2008 14:49:47 -0500 Original-Received: from romy.inter.net.il ([213.8.233.24]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JVXiM-0001Tw-NK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Mar 2008 14:49:46 -0500 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-83-130-252-229.inter.net.il [83.130.252.229]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id KKE16739 (AUTH halo1); Sat, 1 Mar 2008 21:49:26 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <878x121lwk.fsf@red-bean.com> (message from Karl Fogel on Sat, 01 Mar 2008 10:52:59 -0500) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: FreeBSD 4.7-5.2 (or MacOS X 10.2-10.4) (2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:91000 Archived-At: > From: Karl Fogel > Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2008 10:52:59 -0500 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > So you think that commit/revert wars and forks are a better > > alternative than clear, agreed-upon rules? > > At this point I have to roll my eyes. Sorry, I hadn't realized we > were operating at the level of rhetoric used in U.S. presidental > campaigns rather than that used on free software development lists. I take that as a somewhat strange expression of unwillingness to continue this discussion, and will respect that unwillingness.