From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Moving to bzr? Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2009 06:20:31 +0200 Message-ID: References: <871vviif6s.fsf@xemacs.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1231129241 16569 80.91.229.12 (5 Jan 2009 04:20:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 04:20:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 05 05:21:51 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LJgyM-0002ic-Hu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 05:21:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33184 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LJgx6-00061u-TN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 04 Jan 2009 23:20:32 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LJgx2-00061b-Fn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jan 2009 23:20:28 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LJgx0-00061P-Tx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jan 2009 23:20:28 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=51621 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LJgx0-00061M-OO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jan 2009 23:20:26 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout2.012.net.il ([84.95.2.4]:37249) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LJgx0-0008LL-DK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jan 2009 23:20:26 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.i_mtaout2.012.net.il by i_mtaout2.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) id <0KCZ00G00D7LN700@i_mtaout2.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 06:20:26 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.70.20.81]) by i_mtaout2.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) with ESMTPA id <0KCZ00FGCDE1V4V5@i_mtaout2.012.net.il>; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 06:20:25 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <871vviif6s.fsf@xemacs.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 9.1 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:107592 Archived-At: > From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" > Cc: dhruva , > emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2009 12:50:51 +0900 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > Is "bzr pull" the equivalent of "cvs up -d"? That is, is that the > > command to resync with the master repository? Because if it is, it is > > slower than CVS by a large margin (but so is git's 3 min, so I assume > > "bzr pull" is not the equivalent of "cvs up -d"). > > Are you testing on Windows? git has historically had performance > problems on Windows because its Unix-oriented optimizations are often > pessimizations on Windows. No, I didn't mean to say that git is slow _for_me_. I was referring to the git performance numbers by the OP: > > I am updating bzr from their development branch and hence have the > > latest and greatest. When I run a 'bzr pull' on Emacs repo daily, it > > is running for >15 mins versus less than 3 mins for git. This is a ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ "Less than 3 mins" is too slow, if what I've heard about git is correct. Maybe the OP was testing that on Windows.