From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason Rumney Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: display word wrapping Date: Mon, 31 May 2004 20:09:24 +0100 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <20040531013831.AA50.LEKTU@mi.madritel.es> <20040531153907.3F41.JMBARRANQUERO@wke.es> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1086030679 3391 80.91.224.253 (31 May 2004 19:11:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 31 May 2004 19:11:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Mon May 31 21:11:12 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BUsBk-0003hz-00 for ; Mon, 31 May 2004 21:11:12 +0200 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BUsBk-0000CP-00 for ; Mon, 31 May 2004 21:11:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BUsBw-0002VU-FL for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Mon, 31 May 2004 15:11:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BUsBl-0002Th-Rs for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 31 May 2004 15:11:13 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BUsBk-0002T5-4l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 31 May 2004 15:11:13 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BUsBk-0002So-1W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 31 May 2004 15:11:12 -0400 Original-Received: from [194.106.33.237] (helo=outmail.freedom2surf.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.34) id 1BUsAO-0003RW-TT; Mon, 31 May 2004 15:09:49 -0400 Original-Received: from wanchan.jasonrumney.net (i-195-137-77-250.freedom2surf.net [195.137.77.250]) by outmail.freedom2surf.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i4VJ9lU9027911; Mon, 31 May 2004 20:09:47 +0100 Original-Received: from NYAUMO (nyaumo.jasonrumney.net [10.0.0.27]) by wanchan.jasonrumney.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ECCBDDD45; Mon, 31 May 2004 20:09:47 +0100 (BST) Original-To: Juanma Barranquero In-Reply-To: <20040531153907.3F41.JMBARRANQUERO@wke.es> (Juanma Barranquero's message of "Mon, 31 May 2004 16:40:41 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3.50 (windows-nt) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:24296 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:24296 Juanma Barranquero writes: > It doesn't affect. Code generated with or without "volatile" is > byte-by-byte identical (I suppose the optimizer's assuming the variable > doesn't need to be really volatile, because it is a stack var whose > address is not taken). Yes, MSVC is notorious for ignoring directives like this.