From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: PURESIZE increased (again) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 21:41:35 +0300 Message-ID: References: <87lku5u6tx.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> <200604212310.k3LNA3Jp018780@jane.dms.auburn.edu> <200604230159.k3N1xpBu021881@jane.dms.auburn.edu> <17482.63611.279099.670761@farnswood.snap.net.nz> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1145817769 28485 80.91.229.2 (23 Apr 2006 18:42:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 18:42:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 23 20:42:47 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FXjXh-0003Jj-J7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Apr 2006 20:42:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FXjXh-0000kd-1B for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Apr 2006 14:42:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FXjWc-0000Kx-W3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Apr 2006 14:41:39 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FXjWb-0000Jw-Ee for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Apr 2006 14:41:38 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FXjWb-0000Jm-9Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Apr 2006 14:41:37 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.66] (helo=romy.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FXjYe-0007XN-Va for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Apr 2006 14:43:45 -0400 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-228-236-24.inter.net.il [84.228.236.24]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id EAN84315 (AUTH halo1); Sun, 23 Apr 2006 21:41:33 +0300 (IDT) Original-To: Nick Roberts In-reply-to: <17482.63611.279099.670761@farnswood.snap.net.nz> (message from Nick Roberts on Sun, 23 Apr 2006 15:46:03 +1200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:53271 Archived-At: > From: Nick Roberts > Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 15:46:03 +1200 > Cc: Luc Teirlinck , romain@orebokech.com, > Reiner.Steib@gmx.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > Again, this is 170KB growth, certainly not a negligible amount of > > memory. > > But given the RAM doubles every 18-24 months, increasing by only 13 percent a > year means Emacs is becoming progressively easier to run. Maybe _you_ buy a new machine or upgrade its memory once every 18-24 months. I don't.