From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: delete-process bug Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 06:32:24 +0300 Message-ID: References: <87k69eyddj.fsf@lrde.org> <87fyj0r41g.fsf@lrde.org> <20060524112846.GA12046@agmartin.aq.upm.es> <87bqtmjrsh.fsf_-_@lrde.org> <87odxjakox.fsf@lrde.org> <8764jrlewm.fsf@lrde.org> <87pshyqgtd.fsf@lrde.org> <87fyiuq9t5.fsf@lrde.org> <877j45rj3w.fsf@lrde.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1148873573 16017 80.91.229.2 (29 May 2006 03:32:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 03:32:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: agustin.martin@hispalinux.es, michael.cadilhac@lrde.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 29 05:32:50 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FkYUr-0006bb-HC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 29 May 2006 05:32:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FkYUq-0004dq-Tg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 28 May 2006 23:32:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FkYUb-0004bb-Kz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 May 2006 23:32:33 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FkYUa-0004Z9-92 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 May 2006 23:32:33 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FkYUa-0004Z1-1t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 May 2006 23:32:32 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.66] (helo=romy.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FkYa3-0001pC-QC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 May 2006 23:38:12 -0400 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-83-130-199-77.inter.net.il [83.130.199.77]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id ESC11173 (AUTH halo1); Mon, 29 May 2006 06:32:25 +0300 (IDT) Original-To: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) In-reply-to: (storm@cua.dk) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:55393 Archived-At: > From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) > Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 23:15:58 +0200 > Cc: Agustin Martin , > Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org > > But I also wonder if any of the async process stuff actually works > without SIGCHLD ?!? Are there any systems which support async processes > but don't have SIGCHLD? AFAIK, MS-Windows is such a system. (I didn't track this discussion, so I don't know if the Windows case is relevant to it.)