From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tom Rauchenwald Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Customizing coding priority Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 05:58:01 +0100 Message-ID: References: <17837.26945.133317.830421@kamaloka.dhatu> <17837.55152.906774.97483@relwi-sven.unibe.ch> <17838.42714.915656.255057@relwi-sven.unibe.ch> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1169096354 8552 80.91.229.12 (18 Jan 2007 04:59:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 04:59:14 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 18 05:59:12 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1H7PMj-0000dY-0s for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Jan 2007 05:59:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H7PMj-0008R9-Kd for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 23:59:09 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H7PMX-0008Qu-US for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 23:58:57 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H7PMV-0008Qi-JU for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 23:58:56 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H7PMV-0008Qf-DV for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 23:58:55 -0500 Original-Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1H7PMU-0008Lz-U3 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 23:58:55 -0500 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1H7PMK-0001tW-AI for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jan 2007 05:58:44 +0100 Original-Received: from 85-124-150-224.dynamic.xdsl-line.inode.at ([85.124.150.224]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 18 Jan 2007 05:58:44 +0100 Original-Received: from its.sec by 85-124-150-224.dynamic.xdsl-line.inode.at with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 18 Jan 2007 05:58:44 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Lines: 14 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 85-124-150-224.dynamic.xdsl-line.inode.at User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (windows-nt) Cancel-Lock: sha1:U3xvrVMaxvkzOHlD2miHlYwErJc= X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:40408 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > Anyway, this mixing of latin-iso8859-1 and iso-8859-15 _is_, most > probably, your problem. Assuming you use Emacs 21.x (is that right?), > Emacs is trying to do what it cannot do in v21.x: encode 8859-1 and > 8859-15 characters in the same message. That is why you get > iso-2022-jp encoding. Are you sure about this? Both charsets are basically the same, for the german-speaking area the only difference i can think of is the addition of the euro-sign. So for a few umlauts it doesn't matter which charset is used. Tom