From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Removing MULTI_KBOARD Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 16:30:41 +0300 Message-ID: References: <200807310343.m6V3h1Zo006813@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> <200807311921.m6VJLxu1016770@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> <200808011209.m71C9Tj3018356@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1217597506 11376 80.91.229.12 (1 Aug 2008 13:31:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 13:31:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dan Nicolaescu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 01 15:32:36 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KOukD-0004Mc-3d for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 15:32:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38597 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KOujI-00006L-GS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 09:31:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KOujD-00005b-E4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 09:31:31 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KOujC-000058-Ld for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 09:31:31 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=58787 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KOujC-000055-Do for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 09:31:30 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout1.012.net.il ([84.95.2.1]:62261) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KOujB-0003Oi-VE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 09:31:30 -0400 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.228.238]) by i-mtaout1.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0K4X00JDBC7D6TN0@i-mtaout1.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 16:30:49 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <200808011209.m71C9Tj3018356@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 9.1 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:101879 Archived-At: > From: Dan Nicolaescu > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 05:09:29 -0700 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > did we agree to remove MULTI_KBOARD or didn't we? > > Why? Because if it was discussed and I missed that, or by my silence let it look like I don't object, I have only myself to blame and will need to live with the results. If not, then there are other options. But basically, I don't understand why a simple question cannot be answered without further ado. Is something wrong with how I asked it?