From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs 21/22: french =?iso-8859-1?q?=E7?= and =?utf-8?b?xZM=?= Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 22:26:05 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87ljwa6zjj.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <87bpx65fjj.fsf@mat.ucm.es> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1225139284 20992 80.91.229.12 (27 Oct 2008 20:28:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 20:28:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: oub@mat.ucm.es, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 27 21:29:06 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KuYhv-00076N-1x for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 21:28:59 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59314 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KuYgl-0001Ki-Sg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 16:27:47 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KuYfQ-0000zH-2A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 16:26:24 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KuYfK-0000xx-Cj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 16:26:23 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=50096 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KuYfK-0000xr-8V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 16:26:18 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout3.012.net.il ([84.95.2.7]:29720) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KuYfI-0005Q3-1s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 16:26:18 -0400 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.192.143]) by i_mtaout3.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) with ESMTPA id <0K9E00BGJZI0QYS0@i_mtaout3.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 22:27:37 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 9.1 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:105052 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 10:05:55 -0400 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > As for ispell: I am not sure whether this can be solved on the level of > > lisp or whether somehow the ispell code itself has to be modified. > > That I don't know. If we use latin-1 to communicatr with ispell, then > we need to check that it's indeed correct (maybe ispell expects > latin-9). If ispell indeed expects latin-1, then the problem is > in ispell. IIRC, Ispell supports only single-byte encodings. As such, the encoding it expects is the same encoding used for the dictionary from which the *.hash file was produced. If the dictionary was encoded in Latin-1, that is what Ispell will expect for that dictionary. To have a Latin-9 dictionary, one needs to recode it, and then produce a .hash file and add an entry to ispell-dictionary-base-alist for the new dictionary, stating the correct encoding.