From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: rmail-toggle-header problem Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 10:29:04 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1sbpsyf9y4.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1235118620 19052 80.91.229.12 (20 Feb 2009 08:30:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:30:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Kenichi Handa Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 20 09:31:35 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LaQn9-0004u8-LW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 09:31:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33868 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LaQll-0003Lj-Ph for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 03:30:01 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LaQlg-0003KQ-NX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 03:29:56 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LaQlf-0003JX-R4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 03:29:56 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=47617 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LaQlf-0003JM-GU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 03:29:55 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout1.012.net.il ([84.95.2.1]:24114) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LaQla-0006xX-HD; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 03:29:50 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.i-mtaout1.012.net.il by i-mtaout1.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KFC00800UA09500@i-mtaout1.012.net.il>; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 10:29:41 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.228.82.14]) by i-mtaout1.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KFC00KOJVLAIEE0@i-mtaout1.012.net.il>; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 10:29:35 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 9.1 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:109244 Archived-At: > From: Kenichi Handa > Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 10:35:18 +0900 > Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > In article <1sbpsyf9y4.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>, Glenn Morris writes: > > > I'm not sure that yanking from the full headers makes a lot of sense, > > though. Eg it includes the X-RMAIL headers in the yank. Would you ever > > want to include the full headers (all the Received: etc) in a reply? > > The reason of toggling is just to see the full headers. I > don't intend to yank the full headers when I type r to > reply, and type C-c C-y to yank. But the original pre-mbox Rmail would always yank the full headers when you did that after expanding the headers with rmail-toggle-header. And I find that very convenient, because sometimes I do need to cite all the headers of a message. An important case in point is when I'm talking to some sysadmin about a problem in mail transport and want to show them a message as evidence. > If I really want to put the original full > headers in the reply mail, I'll copy them from RMAIL buffer. This goes both ways: you could as easily delete them after they are copied. > I don't mind how the problem is fixed, but with your patch, > I get the error "Marker does not point anywhere" when I type > C-c C-y. Obviously, the bug should be fixed, but please do not kill the feature whereby C-c C-y copies the full headers.