From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: some emacs history Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 15:30:00 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1272634234 30037 80.91.229.12 (30 Apr 2010 13:30:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 13:30:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Nelson H. F. Beebe" , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 30 15:30:33 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O7qIa-0003KQ-2G for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 15:30:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41373 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O7qIZ-0004MN-4O for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 09:30:31 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1O7qIT-0004MB-Rx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 09:30:25 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=53556 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O7qIR-0004Ll-R6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 09:30:24 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O7qIQ-0003Ed-6A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 09:30:23 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-fx0-f41.google.com ([209.85.161.41]:49242) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O7qIP-0003EG-KA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 09:30:22 -0400 Original-Received: by fxm1 with SMTP id 1so188660fxm.0 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 06:30:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=bu9p2airQrI0F0AULzOkTVONXs0fr2qlWWoNDSSFSMk=; b=ModvMUtJI+SRD/Emspc24mkWlKZElxRyxnKH3dnyjo+eD0kZzoxjIarm9powVHLIgC 3jc/vVirbNCYf7r6YZgGXjIxa/QGfkU++sR8L3DFeW54bpNWOWTL4N1SM5klAeOtuNhg 8IjSzxrqki2mMxVRccdgUhKEjIC203Rue27KQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=iqnIJBEyKdVvGho187AWa8EjkzFVW7u3rLec2f+F9wNMYBJrIvXtcTZE7FKsYIv7aU XT1uNyDhgNVI/3IlP8QbcUS6I0pc0BW7/DbtnfwC7mLJ+tO0yeJn5IpGB6ZtYdoBKMz7 nh+D81vjh7YWUGgLrMEMbioN8V4qf6clcMrIc= Original-Received: by 10.239.192.79 with SMTP id d15mr203995hbi.160.1272634220138; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 06:30:20 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.239.164.81 with HTTP; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 06:30:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:124358 Archived-At: On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Stefan Monnier wrote: >>>>>> "Nelson" =3D=3D Nelson H F Beebe writes: > >> There is a new paper that has just appeared that documents some early >> history of emacs that may be of interest to some of you. =C2=A0The DOI i= n >> the BibTeX entry below leads to a PDF file, but it may require an IEEE >> digital library subscription for yourself or your employer: > > http://tenex.opost.com/anhc-31-4-anec.pdf > > Seems to work without you having to pay to get access to what has > already been paid by taxpayers. This is a big problem with doi. It may point to hidden resources and in fact be totally useless for those who does not have access. Does Open Access provide something similar? I think that should be done and promoted in place of doi (or doi should change).