From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: @key{Mouse-1} Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 10:58:44 +0200 Message-ID: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1224417314 3991 80.91.229.12 (19 Oct 2008 11:55:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 11:55:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Richard Stallman , Karl Berry To: Chong Yidong Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 19 13:52:52 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KrU9a-0004b0-5g for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 19 Oct 2008 11:00:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54852 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KrU8V-0005xw-7C for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 19 Oct 2008 04:59:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KrU8Q-0005xr-38 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Oct 2008 04:59:38 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KrU8P-0005xf-5d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Oct 2008 04:59:37 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=33421 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KrU8O-0005xc-Vb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Oct 2008 04:59:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout5.012.net.il ([84.95.2.13]:64660) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KrU8N-0001BJ-Fy; Sun, 19 Oct 2008 04:59:35 -0400 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.126.98.197]) by i_mtaout5.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) with ESMTPA id <0K8Z00CCSAC8DIS0@i_mtaout5.012.net.il>; Sun, 19 Oct 2008 11:00:09 +0200 (IST) X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 9.1 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:104629 Archived-At: This fragment of a change for the Emacs manual: @findex mouse-secondary-save-then-kill @kindex M-Mouse-3 -@item M-Mouse-3 -Make a secondary selection, using the place specified with @kbd{M-Mouse-1} -as the other end (@code{mouse-secondary-save-then-kill}). This also -puts the selected text in the kill ring. A second click at the same +@item M-@key{Mouse-3} +Set the secondary selection, with one end at the position clicked and +the other at the position specified with @kbd{M-Mouse-1} +(@code{mouse-secondary-save-then-kill}). This also puts the selected +text in the kill ring. A second @kbd{M-@key{Mouse-3}} at the same place kills the secondary selection just made. is typical of changes installed recently that use @key for mouse buttons. Yet is this usage correct? The Texinfo manual says: Use the `@key' command for the conventional name for a key on a keyboard and proceeds to give examples that only involve keyboard keys. In a printed manual, @key{Foo} is typeset as a graphical image of a keyboard key, with the argument "Foo" as its label. Do we want to see a keyboard key labeled "Mouse-1" in the printed manual? Maybe we should add a @button command to Texinfo?