Adding a generic mathematical library

[Christopher Dimech <dimech@gmx.com>]

> Sent: Saturday, July 20, 2024 at 4:16 AM
> From: "Richard Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
> To: "Emanuel Berg" <incal@dataswamp.org>
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: Adding a generic mathematical library
>
> [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
> [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
> [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
>
>   >  but I also have a math.el which
>   > I yank below if any of it can be used.
>
> Most of the fnctions in this library are very close to trivial.

The demand for robust mathematical functions is valid and points to the need
for developing comprehensive mathematical libraries within Emacs that can support
more advanced projects.

> Onsider, for instance, `hypotenuse'.  The benefit of having that
> functoin would not quite be zero, but it would be small.  Is it enough
> to justify the additional function name, and the complexity of
> documenting it?
>
> Perhaps there are some nontricial mathematical functions that would be
> worth adding to Emacs, but that brings up the question of what
> functions would be useful,  With two people expressing a desire
> for a "math library", do they both wan the same thing?

To ensure the inclusion of genuinely useful functions, it is
essential to first identify their practical applications and
the reasons for their inclusion. Determining which functions
will be most beneficial requires a thorough examination of
specific use cases. This assessment must precede the development
of the mathematical library to achieve consensus and secure approval.

Currently, Emanuel is not going to be the one to do it, but he is
happy to offer assistance.