From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kenichi Handa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: greek-style quotes for greek input method? Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2010 17:03:18 +0900 Message-ID: References: <87r5i9dye9.fsf@kobe.laptop> <87hbj45lae.fsf@kobe.laptop> <87d3ts5l1u.fsf@kobe.laptop> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp-2 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1281341023 4733 80.91.229.12 (9 Aug 2010 08:03:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 08:03:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Giorgos Keramidas Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 09 10:03:42 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OiNKd-0005V4-Ov for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Aug 2010 10:03:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54049 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OiNKd-0003Pw-8X for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Aug 2010 04:03:39 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=42442 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OiNKT-0003PF-1k for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Aug 2010 04:03:30 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OiNKR-0004Qm-Bi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Aug 2010 04:03:28 -0400 Original-Received: from mx1.aist.go.jp ([150.29.246.133]:55706) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OiNKQ-0004QE-SL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Aug 2010 04:03:27 -0400 Original-Received: from rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp (rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp [150.29.254.115]) by mx1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id o7983JOU029709; Mon, 9 Aug 2010 17:03:19 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from smtp1.aist.go.jp by rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id o7983Jll008224; Mon, 9 Aug 2010 17:03:19 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: by smtp1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id o7983Iuv014795; Mon, 9 Aug 2010 17:03:19 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from handa by etlken with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1OiNKI-000475-Pm; Mon, 09 Aug 2010 17:03:18 +0900 In-Reply-To: <87d3ts5l1u.fsf@kobe.laptop> (message from Giorgos Keramidas on Mon, 09 Aug 2010 09:58:53 +0300) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 9 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:128455 Archived-At: In article <87d3ts5l1u.fsf@kobe.laptop>, Giorgos Keramidas writes: > > Should we also modify the greek-postfix rules to include "<;" and ">;" > > for the same? > Something like this perhaps? [...] > (quail-define-package > "greek-postfix" "GreekPost" "$B&7(B" nil > @@ -1419,7 +1421,9 @@ e.g. > ("i:;" ?$(D&v(B) > ("i;:" ?$(D&v(B) > ("y:;" ?$(D&{(B) > - ("y;:" ?$(D&{(B)) > + ("y;:" ?$(D&{(B) > + ("<;" ?,A+(B) > + (">;" ?,A;(B)) I'm not sure. In many Latin prefix methods, "~<" is used for ",A+(B", but in Latin prefix methods, "<<" is used for ",A+(B". It seems that this asymmetricness has some meaning. Isn't it more convenient also for greek-postfix to use "<<" provided that there's no standard for it. --- Kenichi Handa handa@m17n.org