From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kenichi Handa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7626: 23.2.91; Rmail shows incorrect message encoding in the mode line Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 10:22:35 +0900 Message-ID: References: <83ei9miqef.fsf@gnu.org> <83tyhsq395.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1295227557 15599 80.91.229.12 (17 Jan 2011 01:25:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 01:25:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 7626@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 17 02:25:52 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pedqx-0000st-JV for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 02:25:51 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38568 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pedqx-0005MX-2b for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 16 Jan 2011 20:25:51 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=39810 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pedpf-0004ky-JM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jan 2011 20:24:32 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pedpe-0005yj-ME for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jan 2011 20:24:31 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:55047) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pedpe-0005yd-JP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jan 2011 20:24:30 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PedgV-0007PY-Hc; Sun, 16 Jan 2011 20:15:03 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Kenichi Handa Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 01:15:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7626 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7626-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7626.129522690128466 (code B ref 7626); Mon, 17 Jan 2011 01:15:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7626) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Jan 2011 01:15:01 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PedgS-0007P5-Lg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jan 2011 20:15:00 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.aist.go.jp ([150.29.246.133]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PedgP-0007Oo-2k for 7626@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jan 2011 20:14:58 -0500 Original-Received: from rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp (rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp [150.29.254.115]) by mx1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id p0H1Man2020847; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 10:22:36 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from smtp3.aist.go.jp by rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id p0H1Mapx013645; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 10:22:36 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: by smtp3.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id p0H1MZf9017768; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 10:22:35 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from handa by etlken with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pednn-0001ES-Ok; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 10:22:35 +0900 In-Reply-To: (message from Eli Zaretskii on Fri, 14 Jan 2011 12:22:30 -0500) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 20:15:03 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:43408 Archived-At: In article , Eli Zaretskii writes: > > I think the buffer-file-coding-system of rmail buffer should > > leave the EOL type unspecified in any cases. > Why would this be useful? In any case, this is a change in behavior > from previous Rmail versions. Rmail-mime does not perform file I/O, but decodes a text that is already stored in a mbox buffer. So, we don't have any information about by what kind of EOL format the decoded text should be encoded out to a file. If we leave the EOL type unspecified, it will be encoded by whatever EOL format defined for the current system. --- Kenichi Handa handa@m17n.org