From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kenichi Handa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: arrow keys vs. C-f/b/n/p Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 19:24:40 +0900 Message-ID: References: <87d3w2ncqs.fsf_-_@lola.goethe.zz> <87iq5py7xk.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <871vcc4xhf.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <83ljakliqt.fsf@gnu.org> <838w6jk52k.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1276424699 26026 80.91.229.12 (13 Jun 2010 10:24:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 10:24:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 13 12:24:57 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ONkN5-0002Jh-O4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 13 Jun 2010 12:24:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41292 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ONkN4-0006Jv-Qc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 13 Jun 2010 06:24:54 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=53596 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ONkMy-0006Jq-L4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Jun 2010 06:24:49 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ONkMw-0004DG-JE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Jun 2010 06:24:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mx1.aist.go.jp ([150.29.246.133]:61571) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ONkMu-0004Ct-5O; Sun, 13 Jun 2010 06:24:44 -0400 Original-Received: from rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp (rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp [150.29.254.115]) by mx1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id o5DAOfcY004957; Sun, 13 Jun 2010 19:24:41 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from smtp3.aist.go.jp by rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id o5DAOfnT012260; Sun, 13 Jun 2010 19:24:41 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: by smtp3.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id o5DAOeDH003644; Sun, 13 Jun 2010 19:24:40 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from handa by etlken with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ONkMq-000796-My; Sun, 13 Jun 2010 19:24:40 +0900 In-Reply-To: <838w6jk52k.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Sun, 13 Jun 2010 06:02:43 +0300) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 9 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:125873 Archived-At: In article <838w6jk52k.fsf@gnu.org>, Eli Zaretskii writes: > "Paragraph direction" is the term used by UAX#9. I'm trying to use > terminology that is accepted there, so people who know about this or > want to read the description of the Unicode Bidirectional Algorithm > would not be confused. Hmmm, ok, it's up to you. > > many people misunderstood that even latin letters are written from > > right to left in a paragraph (or a buffer) of "r2l direction". > ??? Latin text is always displayed left to right, independent of the > paragraph direction. More generally, text direction is independent of > the paragraph direction. Of course I know that. But, I remember I got several questions why they are so. --- Kenichi Handa handa@m17n.org