From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kenichi Handa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Merging emacs-23 into trunk Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 14:09:15 +0900 Message-ID: References: <0ybp5wzz95.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <834obofqyk.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1289452177 20021 80.91.229.12 (11 Nov 2010 05:09:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 05:09:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 11 06:09:31 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PGPPe-0004QC-VW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 06:09:31 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34484 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PGPPe-0003Wp-FJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 00:09:30 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=37542 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PGPPa-0003Wk-VN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 00:09:27 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PGPPZ-0006Lo-2C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 00:09:26 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.aist.go.jp ([150.29.246.133]:49836) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PGPPV-0006Kc-R9; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 00:09:22 -0500 Original-Received: from rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp (rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp [150.29.254.115]) by mx1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id oAB59GRM022720; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 14:09:16 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from smtp1.aist.go.jp by rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id oAB59Gep009933; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 14:09:16 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: by smtp1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id oAB59FDt022551; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 14:09:15 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from handa by etlken with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PGPPP-0000Xn-Gu; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 14:09:15 +0900 In-Reply-To: <834obofqyk.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Thu, 11 Nov 2010 06:02:11 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 9 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:132535 Archived-At: In article <834obofqyk.fsf@gnu.org>, Eli Zaretskii writes: > > PS I don't recall seeing a compelling reason as to why configure needs > > to be in the repository at all > The reason is that if we don't keep it in the repository, everyone > should have Autoconf installed. Whether this is "compelling", I don't > know. We can include configure in tarball. For those who get the source from bzr, asking them to install autoconf is, I think, no big deal. --- Kenichi Handa handa@m17n.org