From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kenichi Handa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7626: 23.2.91; Rmail shows incorrect message encoding in the mode line Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 13:28:10 +0900 Message-ID: References: <83ei9miqef.fsf@gnu.org> <83tyhsq395.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1294980880 17644 80.91.229.12 (14 Jan 2011 04:54:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 04:54:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 7626@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 14 05:54:36 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PdbgC-0006jb-R9 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 05:54:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52577 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PdbgC-0006lG-CX for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 23:54:28 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=54316 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pdbg6-0006kr-3T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 23:54:22 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pdbg4-0002Is-PG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 23:54:22 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:33236) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pdbg4-0002Im-N3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 23:54:20 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pdb9p-0004Q6-PU; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 23:21:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Kenichi Handa Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 04:21:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7626 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7626-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7626.129497884016964 (code B ref 7626); Fri, 14 Jan 2011 04:21:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7626) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Jan 2011 04:20:40 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pdb9U-0004PZ-1M for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 23:20:40 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.aist.go.jp ([150.29.246.133]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pdb9R-0004PN-Sj for 7626@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 23:20:38 -0500 Original-Received: from rqsmtp2.aist.go.jp (rqsmtp2.aist.go.jp [150.29.254.123]) by mx1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id p0E4SAu4003092; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 13:28:10 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from smtp4.aist.go.jp by rqsmtp2.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id p0E4SAHI006568; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 13:28:10 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: by smtp4.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id p0E4SAtN003091; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 13:28:10 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from handa by etlken with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PdbGk-0004SB-6W; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 13:28:10 +0900 In-Reply-To: <83tyhsq395.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Sat, 01 Jan 2011 13:20:38 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 23:21:01 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:43356 Archived-At: In article <83tyhsq395.fsf@gnu.org>, Eli Zaretskii writes: > . If the message has an explicit specification of its charset, the > EOL type of the RMAIL buffer is left unspecified (displayed as `:' > in the mode line). By contrast, when there's no charset= spec, the > EOL type is correctly set to -unix. I think the buffer-file-coding-system of rmail buffer should leave the EOL type unspecified in any cases. So I added this code: (set-buffer-file-coding-system (coding-system-base rmail-mime-coding-system) t t)) --- Kenichi Handa handa@m17n.org