From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kenichi Handa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: improve rmail's MIME handling Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 15:38:27 +0900 Message-ID: References: <83r5e874ab.fsf@gnu.org> <19699.7405.907052.380667@rgr.rgrjr.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1291012730 20558 80.91.229.12 (29 Nov 2010 06:38:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 06:38:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eliz@gnu.org, monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Bob Rogers Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 29 07:38:44 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PMxNq-0002Kg-N1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 07:38:42 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52881 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PMxNp-0000mf-VH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 01:38:42 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=39325 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PMxNh-0000ma-3P for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 01:38:34 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PMxNg-0005W7-14 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 01:38:33 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.aist.go.jp ([150.29.246.133]:32897) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PMxNe-0005Ug-3D; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 01:38:30 -0500 Original-Received: from rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp (rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp [150.29.254.115]) by mx1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id oAT6cSuN022536; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 15:38:28 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from smtp1.aist.go.jp by rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id oAT6cS5P017315; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 15:38:28 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: by smtp1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id oAT6cRmN023618; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 15:38:27 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from handa by etlken with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PMxNb-0008VE-DV; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 15:38:27 +0900 In-Reply-To: <19699.7405.907052.380667@rgr.rgrjr.com> (message from Bob Rogers on Sun, 28 Nov 2010 22:24:29 -0500) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 9 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:133222 Archived-At: In article <19699.7405.907052.380667@rgr.rgrjr.com>, Bob Rogers writes: [...] > In RMAIL, as `g' is for getting new mails, it can't be used > for toggling the MIME handling. In Gnus it seems C-u C-u g > also toggles headers. So one idea is to use `t' in RMAIL to > toggle MIME handling too. But, in RMAIL, `t' still decodes > subect, etc. according to RFC2047 . . . > FWIW, the VM mail reader (which also uses "g" to get mail and "t" to > toggle headers) uses "D", for "decode MIME". Does "D" just decode MIME instead of togging the decoding and undecoding of MIME? Does VM decode encoded-words of headers only when "D" is typed? --- Kenichi Handa handa@m17n.org