From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kenichi Handa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: BZR and the bootstrap Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 16:32:21 +0900 Message-ID: References: <4C5D8EB2.7090601@alice.it> <83zkwwv6k6.fsf@gnu.org> <87k4nzh8tq.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1281425561 4342 80.91.229.12 (10 Aug 2010 07:32:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 07:32:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 10 09:32:40 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OijKA-0000H5-DO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 09:32:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57852 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OijK9-0004bZ-Px for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 03:32:37 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=45998 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OijK1-0004a5-Bo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 03:32:30 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OijJz-0005DF-4I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 03:32:28 -0400 Original-Received: from mx1.aist.go.jp ([150.29.246.133]:45615) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OijJw-0005CE-Om; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 03:32:25 -0400 Original-Received: from rqsmtp2.aist.go.jp (rqsmtp2.aist.go.jp [150.29.254.123]) by mx1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id o7A7WM4Z028542; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 16:32:22 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from smtp4.aist.go.jp by rqsmtp2.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id o7A7WMEa012461; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 16:32:22 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: by smtp4.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id o7A7WL1C011919; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 16:32:21 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from handa by etlken with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1OijJt-00066J-Pn; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 16:32:21 +0900 In-Reply-To: (message from Eli Zaretskii on Tue, 10 Aug 2010 02:19:01 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 9 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:128528 Archived-At: In article , Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > Probably because Emacs calls VC every time it needs to visit a file > > > that is in a versioned directory. > > > > But shouldn't bootstrap avoid visiting files? > Why should it? And how can it, if it must produce loaddefs.el, > finder-inf.el, etc.? I think just turning off VC-facility while building is good. Are there any merit in having it while building? --- Kenichi Handa handa@m17n.org