From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kenichi Handa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Compositions and bidi display Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 11:28:40 +0900 Message-ID: References: <3A521851-F7CC-45DB-A2ED-8348EF96D5CF@Freenet.DE> <83fx2q5w86.fsf@gnu.org> <834oj22e96.fsf@gnu.org> <837hnuys42.fsf@gnu.org> <83mxwoxo1t.fsf@gnu.org> <83d3xjxys1.fsf@gnu.org> <838w87x87a.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1272594423 4366 80.91.229.12 (30 Apr 2010 02:27:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 02:27:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 30 04:27:02 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O7fwT-0002os-Kw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 04:27:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42149 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O7fwT-0000jF-1U for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 22:27:01 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1O7fw4-0000cU-W9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 22:26:37 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=49154 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O7fw3-0000bz-Nh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 22:26:36 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O7fw2-00022S-R8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 22:26:35 -0400 Original-Received: from mx1.aist.go.jp ([150.29.246.133]:62243) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O7fvy-00020w-Qq; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 22:26:31 -0400 Original-Received: from rqsmtp2.aist.go.jp (rqsmtp2.aist.go.jp [150.29.254.123]) by mx1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id o3U2QPF9005888; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 11:26:25 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from smtp4.aist.go.jp by rqsmtp2.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id o3U2QPSn013261; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 11:26:25 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: by smtp4.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id o3U2QO1E026271; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 11:26:24 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from handa by etlken with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O7fy4-00054Q-SW; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 11:28:40 +0900 In-Reply-To: <838w87x87a.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Thu, 29 Apr 2010 06:12:57 +0300) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 9 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:124335 Archived-At: In article <838w87x87a.fsf@gnu.org>, Eli Zaretskii writes: > > From: Stefan Monnier > > Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 18:49:39 -0400 > > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Kenichi Handa > > > > > Btw, do we still need to support static compositions? Those are based > > > on the `composition' text property, which are no longer supported, > > > right? Or am I confused? > > > > They're not? > I deduced this from the fact that we removed Qcomposition and the > associated handle_composition_prop from xdisp.c. Again, I could be > confused. ??? I've never removed handle_composition_prop nor any of codes for static composition. --- Kenichi Handa handa@m17n.org