From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kenichi Handa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 16:14:15 +0900 Message-ID: References: <83aalde3i0.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1289978085 3245 80.91.229.12 (17 Nov 2010 07:14:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 07:14:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eliz@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Kenichi Handa Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 17 08:14:36 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PIcDx-0001xz-8M for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 08:14:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48925 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PIcDv-0000su-Ur for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 02:14:31 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=41276 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PIcDn-0000rm-MM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 02:14:24 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PIcDm-00078K-JC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 02:14:23 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.aist.go.jp ([150.29.246.133]:58722) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PIcDk-00077o-BF; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 02:14:20 -0500 Original-Received: from rqsmtp2.aist.go.jp (rqsmtp2.aist.go.jp [150.29.254.123]) by mx1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id oAH7EGpa022417; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 16:14:16 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from smtp4.aist.go.jp by rqsmtp2.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id oAH7EGnm021097; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 16:14:16 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: by smtp4.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id oAH7EGb0010198; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 16:14:16 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from handa by etlken with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PIcDg-00058w-11; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 16:14:16 +0900 In-Reply-To: (message from Kenichi Handa on Wed, 17 Nov 2010 14:58:15 +0900) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 9 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:132768 Archived-At: In article , Kenichi Handa writes: > > . Composite characters are displayed as question marks regardless of > > the setting of glyphless-char-display-control. I think this is > > because term.c:produce_composite_glyph does not consider the new > > glyphless-char display feature. I think users will expect that > > composite characters behave like un-encodable characters on a TTY. > I think composite characters should be sent to a tty as is > (i.e. just sending encoded characters), then terminal may > correctly compose them. Ah, no, I misunderstood what you mean. If the tty doesn't support those characters, we should consult glyphless-char-display. I'll fix it soon. --- Kenichi Handa handa@m17n.org