From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kenichi Handa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7651: 23.2.91; Rmail doesn't allow displaying text attachments conveniently Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 14:36:43 +0900 Message-ID: References: <87vd2ba0zb.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1294120449 11756 80.91.229.12 (4 Jan 2011 05:54:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 05:54:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 7651@debbugs.gnu.org To: Chong Yidong Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 04 06:54:02 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PZzqM-0007Fd-Co for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 06:54:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38416 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PZzqL-0004so-Gp for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 00:54:01 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=34281 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PZzq7-0004rj-2z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 00:53:48 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PZzq5-00009w-JM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 00:53:46 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:38838) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PZzq5-00009o-GQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 00:53:45 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PZzTA-00080C-2p; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 00:30:04 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Kenichi Handa Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 05:30:04 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7651 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7651-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7651.129411898230647 (code B ref 7651); Tue, 04 Jan 2011 05:30:04 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7651) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Jan 2011 05:29:42 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PZzSo-0007yG-1v for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 00:29:42 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.aist.go.jp ([150.29.246.133]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PZzSl-0007y2-4k for 7651@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 00:29:40 -0500 Original-Received: from rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp (rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp [150.29.254.115]) by mx1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id p045aiqP012128; Tue, 4 Jan 2011 14:36:45 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from smtp3.aist.go.jp by rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id p045aiCN016220; Tue, 4 Jan 2011 14:36:44 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: by smtp3.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id p045aiqr006702; Tue, 4 Jan 2011 14:36:44 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from handa by etlken with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PZzZc-0002Pw-3B; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 14:36:44 +0900 In-Reply-To: <87vd2ba0zb.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (message from Chong Yidong on Thu, 30 Dec 2010 20:39:36 +0800) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 00:30:04 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:43079 Archived-At: In article <87vd2ba0zb.fsf@stupidchicken.com>, Chong Yidong writes: > Kenichi Handa writes: > > I've just described the new behavior in info > > (doc/emacs/rmail.texi). Could someone please fix/improve my > > English? > Done. Thank you. But, this senetence will be misunderstood: If the message contains multiple parts (@acronym{MIME} entities), each part is represented by a tagline in the Rmail buffer. Actually, a text/plain part is shown both with a tagline and the decoded body. Does "represented" imply that? And, this is not accurate. @findex rmail-mime-next-item @item @key{TAB} Move point to the next @acronym{MIME} part (@code{rmail-mime-next-item}). It actually moves point to the next displayed items; header, tagline, buttons in tagline, or body. It moves point to the next part only if there's no more displayed item in the current part. --- Kenichi Handa handa@m17n.org