From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: tsugutomo.enami@jp.sony.com Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#18253: 24.4.50; doc string of `remq': correct it per the doc of `remove' Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 07:12:58 +0900 Message-ID: References: <8ef12222-3e52-4775-ac7f-884030340412@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1409005047 8151 80.91.229.3 (25 Aug 2014 22:17:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 22:17:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 18253@debbugs.gnu.org To: Christoph , Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 26 00:17:20 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XM2Zk-0003Xx-5F for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 00:17:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50698 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XM2Zj-0004OM-HS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 18:17:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50494) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XM2Zb-0004NJ-NQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 18:17:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XM2ZS-0006Cp-NP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 18:17:11 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:45090) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XM2ZS-0006Ce-Jt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 18:17:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XM2ZR-0004mM-Qo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 18:17:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: tsugutomo.enami@jp.sony.com Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 22:17:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18253 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 18253-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B18253.140900502018359 (code B ref 18253); Mon, 25 Aug 2014 22:17:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 18253) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Aug 2014 22:17:00 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52033 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XM2ZP-0004m3-Jr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 18:16:59 -0400 Original-Received: from ms5.sony.co.jp ([211.125.136.201]:49457) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XM2ZM-0004ln-S4 for 18253@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 18:16:58 -0400 Original-Received: from mta6.noc.sony.co.jp ([IPv6:2001:cf8:0:192::43]) by ms5.sony.co.jp (R8/Sony) with ESMTP id s7PMGmxi015134 for <18253@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 07:16:48 +0900 (JST) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,398,1406559600"; d="scan'208";a="32293939" Original-Received: from sigxcpu.sm.sony.co.jp ([43.4.4.150]) by mrelay6.noc.sony.co.jp with ESMTP; 26 Aug 2014 07:16:49 +0900 Original-Received: by sigxcpu.sm.sony.co.jp (Postfix, from userid 8324) id 101442DF7C; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 07:12:58 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:92676 Archived-At: Hi, > Thanks for the report. Fixed in trunk r117732. > > On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 8:59 AM, Drew Adams wrote: > > > > > Please explicitly say that `remq' returns a *copy* of LIST, just as we > > do in the doc string of `remove'. It does *not* "Return LIST with all > > occurrences of ELT removed." IMHO, describing remq to return a copy of list is also confusing. Since it does not return a copy on some cases. enami.