From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Yang Yingchao via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#70352: Fwd: Re: bug#70352: 29.3.50; emacs-pgtk: possible leak of virtual memory Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 09:36:50 +0800 Message-ID: References: <87zfty2fh6.fsf@yahoo.com> <86sezprawz.fsf@gnu.org> <87v84l34uy.fsf@yahoo.com> <86bk6dpj2c.fsf@gnu.org> <874jc43gjx.fsf@yahoo.com> <86frvoo5pi.fsf@gnu.org> <87sezo1mr2.fsf@yahoo.com> <867ch0o0wi.fsf@gnu.org> <699acc927ca7decaaac0d06a59c80426bb9ae3059c3eebd7cced56cb021310bf@mu.id> Reply-To: Yang Yingchao Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="15751"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.3; emacs 29.3.50 To: 70352@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 15 03:38:16 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rwBIV-0003tw-Js for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 03:38:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rwBIC-0005F6-Iv; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 21:37:56 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rwBIA-0005Ex-IG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 21:37:54 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rwBI9-0005hs-52 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 21:37:53 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rwBIK-0007uE-CV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 21:38:04 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <871q7argry.fsf@qq.com> Resent-From: Yang Yingchao Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 01:38:04 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 70352 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 70352-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B70352.171314506130130 (code B ref 70352); Mon, 15 Apr 2024 01:38:04 +0000 Original-Received: (at 70352) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Apr 2024 01:37:41 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36407 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rwBHv-0007pf-BN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 21:37:41 -0400 Original-Received: from out203-205-221-149.mail.qq.com ([203.205.221.149]:34835) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rwBHp-0007nR-5i for 70352@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 21:37:37 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=qq.com; s=s201512; t=1713145033; bh=og9249Mz5BSfhsuI64zWsqssVlhVD13zpKdbuqXRG8Q=; h=From:To:Subject:References:Date; b=Kdj3rQSUSOSd6Gwbv7dVqj0Xo0B20YVHP7yG41EbX+4oJsrRejK+I1obiaOUTdc0Y NfwviNHYPbPOO/zVz9/zd+vIaswBlR9rwSiAphVQhjFL7zE4iI8BfEBmF0e6LBrvV0 fOEcxOWkvWfO36cZyxIVZvzAKo03gJcaQI/Q16G4= Original-Received: from tbook ([60.26.145.38]) by newxmesmtplogicsvrszc19-0.qq.com (NewEsmtp) with SMTP id 94B30A36; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 09:37:11 +0800 X-QQ-mid: xmsmtpt1713145031t9x5dergx X-QQ-XMAILINFO: Mm/Yx8ZY6QnDPD8rnOi9oMq2wBcagUHcwKMrGWskqoihsx8+3nNXKzNwcgWMsv DPBMl+XZTVQsHPa32LjNVz16E56RvZ3GQjU1KzR9NHv463KMwY5klDfwccPyf0JSbJ7wEbbw7f8Y 3SlT9fjmtWFTfSZ4QmtfuLya61a/MHqiTVbAr3On1SLbYHQAhcPAg1BzRhUkhKcZMBDNRZ4z5afi QPY0RmRaguf5d6WjfhSLxKzRbGjqac0vhlHYPnjlcQTm2qBfU9uhhLMMRL9FQNsHzDS4Inq78u/U 6xcSt3d5xdytaT5okx1w9LBCV35T80Rf7dpf/6Lv9Tf+7wX3ZjwaPfJaIgoNI08ZZAzYhb7SVaTN XYEovWVqiU2E67NWpxTUYpBG+Ymh0pCv22hXjVJ17BVq4kPe48o12klsTgd/oKNlEzyzmg2cI8xr iYNvkg8MfTnVOuwCtOrJYKP2umb+rz5wN2PYXLE7lscZGlYTia+1XdJzSDs3Xf1Q0vh8Bj6pm4BV szK6nhfL6MSMkiA0sxy8d54xw1vK5Xk1dt5VCwLeC67cGSxvDFODisKY9IGFAHN5koXIf7yfUZu2 2wqm37pvg2zfVPghghRkcBdzxliRPvjTet5SdLEH0NFzPjSUAO4Wyi8ZzrqNUO7LKEF+h9dOh51j ylxPxhmB8p08fM1e+07x/gpweTbBe0/JYYSExYxnwcAE17+JbUStC6Kyl6m05wG34QmwlX4ZTle5 U3hyTBWrGbGBVbyPuCjQ5UWF/gzlAaXYeDm8b4rRWNyFmvEGgzUSSuy/exrSoRH84rTuedFnLMDH KSkZtwqYK/AU0bgcHXg+vuM1j5NPUR0PgAtE1RT3 X-QQ-XMRINFO: OWPUhxQsoeAVDbp3OJHYyFg= Original-Message-ID: <87zftv1k5p.fsf@qq.com> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:283330 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain -------------------- Start of forwarded message -------------------- From: Yang Yingchao To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#70352: 29.3.50; emacs-pgtk: possible leak of virtual memory Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 09:21:04 +0800 --=-=-= Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="==-=-=" --==-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Hi * Eli*, On Sun, Apr 14 2024, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Po Lu >> Cc: bjorn.bidar@thaodan.de, yang.yingchao@qq.com, 70352@debbugs.gnu.org >> Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2024 14:28:33 +0800 >> >> Eli Zaretskii writes: >> >> > I thought the question I asked was for you to answer, not for the OP: >> > how come the OP bumped into a problem that (AFAIU) could only happen >> > when using code that is not in the Emacs Git repository? >> >> Because the OP, presumably, built code that I published elsewhere (and, >> I had hoped, discreetly enough to avoid the attention of casual Emacs >> users). > > If that's what happened, then yes, it explains everything (and means > we don't need to discuss this issue anymore). Sorry for the late response. And actually, I was wrong about the GTK version. I mistook the GTK version as the GTK+ version... Here is the actual version related to GTK+: ``` $ ldd emacs | grep gtk libgtk-3.so.0 => /usr/lib64/libgtk-3.so.0 (0x00007f1e4ba00000) ``` If any other information is required, please let me know. Regards, -- *Yang Yingchao* -------------------- End of forwarded message -------------------- --==-=-=-- --=-=-=--