From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sam Steingold Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9132: 24.0.50; bootstrap failure on windows Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 10:08:08 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83ei1jv9hb.fsf@gnu.org> <837h7bv3r9.fsf@gnu.org> <8362muvoqp.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: sds@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1311343755 26552 80.91.229.12 (22 Jul 2011 14:09:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 14:09:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9132@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 22 16:09:10 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QkGPe-0004ll-30 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 16:09:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55909 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QkGPb-0008Kh-7I for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 10:09:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:47389) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QkGPX-0008KN-9y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 10:09:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QkGPW-0002Bg-5m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 10:09:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:39251) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QkGPW-0002Bc-2W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 10:09:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QkGPW-0001iR-30; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 10:09:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Sam Steingold Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 14:09:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9132 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9132-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9132.13113437066544 (code B ref 9132); Fri, 22 Jul 2011 14:09:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9132) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Jul 2011 14:08:26 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QkGOu-0001hT-8e for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 10:08:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-vw0-f44.google.com ([209.85.212.44]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QkGOs-0001hF-BV for 9132@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 10:08:23 -0400 Original-Received: by vws12 with SMTP id 12so1628556vws.3 for <9132@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 07:08:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :mail-copies-to:return-receipt-to:reply-to:x-attribution :x-disclaimer:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=fQVMEE8AJfdWitgOWnr9+CbSvf17cfWDWVfHMILjV5E=; b=ZUhzTTZo0R0l9I5QluUiDvh7wPtRRUORnWrY6JsrzJFgGyZWze/7V2cm9kMayFfM9X KVOZZBMj0fkZIcPTPwqdOFwQY4y48jFHQ4ff6Jobs8FIbL2Ykzu7bpYq+/DpBMnj2OYI gdiUZcCqCsPQibhtayrlT5QuTP49GOIpvHno8= Original-Received: by 10.220.177.137 with SMTP id bi9mr396184vcb.216.1311343696668; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 07:08:16 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from smsv2-L.wtc.algo (rrcs-24-103-48-205.nyc.biz.rr.com [24.103.48.205]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id cj5sm852606vcb.27.2011.07.22.07.08.09 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 22 Jul 2011 07:08:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8362muvoqp.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 22 Jul 2011 09:00:30 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Mail-Copies-To: never X-Attribution: Sam X-Disclaimer: You should not expect anyone to agree with me. X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 10:09:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:49556 Archived-At: > * Eli Zaretskii [2011-07-22 09:00:30 +0300]: > > So the symbol is bound, but Emacs thinks it's not a function? What > does this print? > > "./../src/oo/i386/emacs.exe" -batch -l ../lisp/emacs-lisp/bytecomp.el > --eval "(print (symbol-function 'batch-byte-compile))" (closure (byte-compile--for-effect print-gensym-alist byte-compile--outbuffer by te-compiler-error-flag byte-compile-free-assignments byte-compile-free-reference s t) (&optional noforce) "Run `byte-compile-file' on the files remaining on the command line. Use this from the command line, with `-batch'; it won't work in an interactive Emacs. Each file is processed even if an error occurred previously. For example, invoke \"emacs -batch -f batch-byte-compile $emacs/ ~/*.el\". If NOFORCE is non-nil, don't recompile a file that seems to be already up-to-date." (defvar command-line-args-left) (if (not noninteractive) (e rror "`batch-byte-compile' is to be used only with -batch")) (let ((error nil)) (while command-line-args-left (if (file-directory-p (expand-file-name (car comma nd-line-args-left))) (let (source dest) (dolist (file (directory-files (car comm and-line-args-left))) (if (and (string-match emacs-lisp-file-regexp file) (not ( auto-save-file-name-p file)) (setq source (expand-file-name file (car command-li ne-args-left))) (setq dest (byte-compile-dest-file source)) (file-exists-p dest) (file-newer-than-file-p source dest)) (if (null (batch-byte-compile-file source )) (setq error t))))) (if (or (not noforce) (let* ((source (car command-line-arg s-left)) (dest (byte-compile-dest-file source))) (or (not (file-exists-p dest)) (file-newer-than-file-p source dest)))) (if (null (batch-byte-compile-file (car command-line-args-left))) (setq error t)))) (setq command-line-args-left (cdr co mmand-line-args-left))) (kill-emacs (if error 1 0)))) >> why do I have oo and oo-spd?! > > oo/ is the unoptimized build, oo-spd/ the optimized one. Neat, ain't > it? I would prefer to be able to specify this from the configure command line. -- Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) on CentOS release 5.6 (Final) X 11.0.60900031 http://ffii.org http://memri.org http://palestinefacts.org http://www.PetitionOnline.com/tap12009/ http://camera.org http://iris.org.il Those, who refuse to do the math, are doomed to talk nonsense.